Classification:

Subfamily: Amblyseiinae

Tribe: Neoseiulini

Genus: Neoseiulus

Species: Neoseiulus californicus

 
Holotype:

Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor, 1954): 89; Whittier, California, USA, on lemon.

 
Synonyms:
Junior synonym of: Neoseiulus marinus (Willmann) — Chant (1959b);
Not junior synonym of: Neoseiulus marinus (Willmann) — Schuster & Pritchard (1963);
Not senior synonym of: Neoseiulus marinus (Willmann) — Tixier et al. (2008a);Neoseiulus ornatus (Athias-Henriot) — Tixier et al. (2008a);
Senior synonym of: Neoseiulus chilenensis (Dosse) — McMurtry & Badii (1989);Neoseiulus chilenensis (Dosse) — Chant & McMurtry (2003a);Neoseiulus chilenensis (Dosse) — El-Banhawy (1979);Neoseiulus mungeri (McGregor) — Chant & McMurtry (2003a);Neoseiulus mungeri (McGregor) — McMurtry (1977b);Neoseiulus mungeri (McGregor) — Schuster & Pritchard (1963);Neoseiulus wearnei (Schicha) — Tixier et al. (2014b);
Suspected not senior synonym of: Neoseiulus chilenensis (Dosse) — Gonzalez & Schuster (1962);
Suspected senior synonym of: Neoseiulus chilenensis (Dosse) — Athias-Henriot (1977);Neoseiulus mungeri (McGregor) — Athias-Henriot (1959);
 
Other Names:
Typhlodromus californicus (original designation) — McGregor (1954)
Typhlodromun [sic] californicusMcGregor (1956)
Amblyseius californicusSchuster & Pritchard (1963)
Cydnodromus californicusAthias-Henriot (1977)
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) californicusUeckermann & Loots (1988)
Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) californicusEhara & Amano (1998)
 
Distribution:
BRAZIL — BAHIA: Ferragut & Navia (2022a);PARANÁ: Araújo et al. (2022a); Hata et al. (2021); Mite fauna abundance and composition on apples in southern Brazil. Systematic & Applied Acarology,27(11), 2139–2155." class="pop-tooltip">Silva et al. (2022);RIO GRANDE DO SUL: Phytoseiid mites associated with Asteraceae plants in the Pampa biome with description of two new species. Interntional Journal of Acarology, 50(7), 570–586." class="pop-tooltip">Castro et al. (2024); Diehl et al. (2012); Eichelberger et al. (2011); Ferla et al. (2007); Ferla et al. (2011); Ferla & Moraes (1998); Ferla & Moraes (2002b); Furtado et al. (2006); Gonçalves et al. (2019); Johann et al. (2014); Johann & Ferla (2012); Klock et al. (2011); Marchetti & Ferla (2011); Reichert et al. (2014); Rocha et al. (2015); Roggia et al. (2009); Silva et al. (2008); Silva et al. (2019b); Silva et al. (2020b); Influência das cultivares de videiras (Vitis vinifera L.) e do sistema de condução sobre a acarofauna. Entomological Communications, 3,ec03023." class="pop-tooltip">Silva et al. (2021a); Mite fauna abundance and composition on apples in southern Brazil. Systematic & Applied Acarology,27(11), 2139–2155." class="pop-tooltip">Silva et al. (2022); Mites associated with Vitis labrusca (Vitaceae) in southern Brazil: population dynamics and ecology.Systematic and Applied Acarology,28(6), 985–994." class="pop-tooltip">Silva et al. (2023c); Mite fauna associated with different environments in the Southern Pampa, Brazil. International Journal of Acarology, 47, 387–­395." class="pop-tooltip">Toldi et al. (2021a); Toldi et al. (2021b);SANTA CATARINA: Mite fauna abundance and composition on apples in southern Brazil. Systematic & Applied Acarology,27(11), 2139–2155." class="pop-tooltip">Silva et al. (2022);SÃO PAULO: Bellini et al. (2005a); Lofego et al. (2009); Montes et al. (2011);
CANADA — ONTARIO: Denmark & Evans (2011);
GUATEMALA: McMurtry (1977b);
REUNION ISLAND: Kreiter et al. (2020d);
SOUTH KOREA: Jung et al. (2006);
TAIWAN:Lo (1986)OBS;
 
Hosts / Substrates (Holotype):
Rutaceae: Lemon — McGregor (1954);
 
Biosystematics: McMurtry & Badii (1989);
Redescription: Adar et al. (2012); Athias-Henriot (1977); Beglyarov (1981); Çakmak & Çobanoğlu (2006); Phytoseiid mites associated with Asteraceae plants in the Pampa biome with description of two new species. Interntional Journal of Acarology, 50(7), 570–586." class="pop-tooltip">Castro et al. (2024); Chant & McMurtry (2003a); Chant & McMurtry (2007); Chatti et al. (2017); Denmark et al. (1999); Denmark & Evans (2011); Döker et al. (2014b); Döker et al. (2015); Döker et al. (2016); Ehara & Amano (1998); Ehara & Amano (2004); Ehara et al. (1994); El-Banhawy (1979); Faraji et al. (2011a); Ferla et al. (2007); Ferla et al. (2011); Ferragut et al. (1983); Ferragut et al. (2010); Ferragut & Navia (2017); Ferragut & Navia (2022a); Guanilo et al. (2008a); Guanilo et al. (2008c); Guanilo & Martínez (2007); Guichou et al. (2010); Jung et al. (2006); Kade et al. (2011); Kanouh et al. (2010b); Klock et al. (2011); Kreiter et al. (2010); Kreiter et al. (2020d); Liao et al. (2021a); Lofego et al. (2009); Lofego et al. (2024); McMurtry (1977b); Papadoulis et al. (2009); Peralta & Tello (2019); Pickett & Gilstrap (1984); Ramirez et al. (1988); Rocha et al. (2014); Rocha et al. (2015); Sahraoui et al. (2012); Schuster & Pritchard (1963); Tixier (2010); Tixier (2012); Tixier (2013); Tixier et al. (2008a); Tixier et al. (2013); Tixier et al. (2014b); Tixier et al. (2016); Integrated taxonomy supports the identification of some species of Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Georgia. Acarologia,61(4), 824–844." class="pop-tooltip">Tixier et al. (2021); Trincado et al. (2018); Tsolakis & Ragusa (2016); Vacante & Nucifora (1987); Yaninek et al. (1989);
 
Notes:
-Neoseiulus californicus was introduced in Taiwan (Lo, 1986) but probably not established, because in several collections accomplished in this country, this species was not recorded (Ho, 2014, pers. communic.).;
 

JUNIOR SYNONYM:

 
Classification:

Subfamily: Amblyseiinae

Subfamily: Amblyseiinae

Tribe: Neoseiulini

Genus: Neoseiulus

Species: Neoseiulus chilenensis

 
Holotype:

Neoseiulus chilenensis (Dosse, 1958a): 55; Valparaiso, Chile, on Eichhornia crassipes.

 
Synonyms:
Junior synonym of: Neoseiulus ornatus (Athias-Henriot) — Chant (1959b);
Not junior synonym of: Neoseiulus ornatus (Athias-Henriot) — Gonzalez & Schuster (1962);Neoseiulus ornatus (Athias-Henriot) — Hirschmann (1962);
 
Other Names:
Typhlodromus chilenensis (original designation) — Dosse (1958a)
Amblyseius chilenensisGonzalez & Schuster (1962)
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) chilenensisEhara (1966a)
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) chilensis [sic] — Ueckermann & Loots (1988)
Neoseiulus chilinensis [sic] — Chant & McMurtry (2003a)
 
Distribution:
BRAZIL — SÃO PAULO: Denmark & Muma (1973);
JAPAN: Ehara (1964);
 
Hosts / Substrates (Holotype):
Pontederiaceae: Eichhornia crassipes — Dosse (1958a);
 
 
Classification:

Subfamily: Amblyseiinae

Tribe: Neoseiulini

Genus: Neoseiulus

Species: Neoseiulus mungeri

 
Holotype:

Neoseiulus mungeri (McGregor, 1954): 92; Whittier, California, USA, on lemon.

 
Synonyms:
Junior synonym of: Neoseiulus marinus(Willmann) — Chant (1959b);
 
Other Names:
Typhlodromus mungeri (original designation) — McGregor (1954)
Typhlodromus (Iphidulus) mungeriMcGregor (1956)
Amblyseius mungeriAthias-Henriot (1959)
 
Distribution:
USA — CALIFORNIA: McGregor (1954);
 
Hosts / Substrates (Holotype):
Rutaceae: Lemon — McGregor (1954);
 
 
Notes:
-Specimens reported by Athias-Henriot (1959) reidentified as N. barkeri — Athias-Henriot (1961).;
 
Classification:

Subfamily: Amblyseiinae

Tribe: Neoseiulini

Genus: Neoseiulus

Species: Neoseiulus wearnei

 
Holotype:

Neoseiulus wearnei (Schicha, 1987): 103; Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia, on Chondrilla juncea.

 
Synonyms:
Junior synonym of: Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) — Tixier et al. (2014b);
Suspected junior synonym of: Neoseiulus fallacis (Garman) — Steiner & Goodwin (2001);
 
Other Names:
Amblyseius wearnei (original desgination) — Schicha (1987)
 
Distribution:
AUSTRALIA — AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY: Schicha (1987);NEW SOUTH WALES: Beard (2001);
 
Hosts / Substrates (Holotype):
Asteraceae: Chondrilla juncea — Schicha (1987);
 
Molecular Characterization: Tixier et al. (2014b);

Development: eCliente Informática