Course detail

ECO5062 - Applied Evolutionary Ecology


Credit hours

In-class work
per week
Practice
per week
Credits
Duration
Total
10
12
8
4 weeks
120 hours

Instructor
Luciano Martins Verdade

Objective
Present and discuss with graduate students problems related to conceptual, technological and institutional limitations related to applied evolutionary ecology.

Content
1. Course presentation
2. Plato vs Darwin: populations, species and evolution.
3. Soulé vs Caughley: small populations x declining populations (problems related to biological conservation I)
5. Management unit x management unit: ecology x biological conservation (problems related to biological conservation II)
6. Diversity vs complexity (problems related to communities)Experimental approach vs common sense (problems related to population diagnosis)
7. Estimates of abundance vs population growth (problems related to populations)
8. Spatial heterogeneity vs temporal heterogeneity (problems related to landscape ecology)
9. Anthropogenic pressure vs adaptation: human history vs. natural history
10. Love in times of cholera: behavioral ecology I (problems related to mating systems and parental care)
11. Alice and Huckleberry Finn in Wonderland: Behavioral Ecology II (problems related to dispersion patterns)
12. Tragedy of the common x sustainability: hunting / fishing and agriculture
13. Declaration of war vs conflict negotiation: pest management
14. Veterinarians vs biologists: ecology of diseases
15. From Popper to Umberto Eco: logic and social life in research

Bibliography
1. Mayr, E. 1970 [1963]. Populações, Espécies e Evolução. Edusp, São Paulo, Brasil. (Cap. 2. Os conceitos de espécie e sua aplicação. p.11-21)
2. Mayr, E. 1976. Evolution and the diversity of life: selected essays. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachsetts, USA (Cap. 33. Species concepts and definitions. p.493-508)
3. Mayr, E. 1970 [1963]. Populações, Espécies e Evolução. Edusp, São Paulo, Brasil. (Cap.5. Mecanismos de isolamento. p.59-73).
4. Caughley G. 1994. Directions in conservation biology. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:215-44.
5. Hedrick P.W., R.C.A.F.W. Lacy & M.E. Soulé. 1996. Directions in conservation biology: comments on Caughley. Conservation Biology 10(5):1312-20.
6. Clinchy M, Krebs CJ. 1997. Viva Caughley! Conservation Biology 11(4):832-3.
7. Verdade, L.M., M.C. Lyra-Jorge & C.I. Piña. 2014. Redirections in conservation biology. p.3-17. In: Verdade, L.M., M.C. Lyra-Jorge & C.I. Piña [Eds.]. Applied Ecology and Human Dimensions in Biological Conservation. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (ISBN 978-3-642-54750-8) (DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54751-5_1).
8. Caughley, G. & A.R.E. Sinclair. 1994. Wildlife ecology and management. 1st ed. Blackwell. Boston. (Cap. 1. Introduction. p.1-8).
9. Oommen, M.A., R. Cooney, M. Ramesh, M. Archer, D. Brockington, B. Buscher, R. Fletcher, D.J.D. Natusch, A.T. Vanak, G. Webb & K. Shanker. In press. The fatal flaws of compassionate conservation. Conservation Biology. 4p.
10. Magnusson, W.E. 2001. Catchments as basic units of management in conservation biology courses. Conservation Biology 15(5):1464-1465.
11. Faith, D. & L.J. Pollock. 2014. Phylogenetic diversity and the sustainable use of biodiversity. p.35-52. In: Verdade, L.M., M.C. Lyra-Jorge & C.I. Piña [Eds.]. Applied ecology and human dimensions on biological conservation. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (ISBN 978-3-642-54750-8) (DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54751-5_3).
12. Seddon, N., G.M. Mace, S. Naeem, J.A. Tobias, A.L. Pigot, R. Cavanagh, D. Mouillot, J. Vause & M. Walpole. 2017. Biodiversity in the Anthropocene: Prospects and policy. Proc. R. Soc. B 283: 20162094 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2094).
13. Lobl, L. 2017. Assessment biodiversity: a pain in the neck. Bionomina 12:39-43.
14. May R, M.J. Crawley & G. Sugihara. 2007. Communities: patterns. p.111-131. In: May R. & A. McLean [Eds]. Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press. Oxford, U.K.
15. Magnusson, W.E. 2002. Community-based ordination: The problem of data handling and interpretation. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 83.1 (2002): 77-81.
16. Magnusson, W.E. 2002. Diversity indices: Multivariate candies from Pandora's box. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 83(1): 86-87.
17. Tylianakis, J.M., E. Laliberté, A. Nielsen & J. Bascompte. 2010. Conservation of species interaction networks. Biological Conservation 143 (2010) 2270–2279.
18. Jost, L. 2006. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113(2):363-375.
19. Cayuela, L., N.J. Gotelli & R.K. Colwell. 2015. Ecological and biogeographical null hyphoteses for comparing rarefaction curves. Ecological Monographs 85(3):437-455.
20. F. Pompanon, B.E. Deagle, W.O.C. Symondson, D.S. Brown, S.N. Jarman & P. Taberlet. 2012. Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing. Molecular Ecology 21:1931–1950.
21. Caughley, G. & A.R.E. Sinclair. 1994. Wildlife ecology and management. 1st ed. Blackwell. Boston. (Cap. 13. Experimental management. p.217-241)
22. Krebs, C.J. 2000. Hypothesis testing in ecology. pp.1-14. In: Boitani, L. & T.K. Fuller [Eds.]. Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences. Columbia University Press. New York.
23. Caughley, G. & A.R.E. Sinclair. 1994. Wildlife ecology and management. 1st ed. Blackwell. Boston. Cap. 12. Counting animals. p.190-216).
24. Nichols, J.D. 2014. The role of abundance estimates in conservation decision-making. p.117-131. In: Verdade, L.M., M.C. Lyra-Jorge & C.I. Piña [Eds.]. Applied ecology and human dimensions on biological conservation. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (ISBN 978-3-642-54750-8) (DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54751-5_8).
25. Verdade, L.M. J.R. Moreira & K.M P.M.B. Ferraz. 2012. Counting Capybaras. p.357-370. In: Moreira, J.R., K.M.P.M.B. Ferraz, E.A. Herrera & D.W. Macdonald [Eds]. Capybara: Biology, Use and Conservation of an Exceptional Neotropical Species. Springer, New York. (ISBN 978-1-4614-3999-8) (DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4000-0_22).
26. Wiens J.A. 2000. Ecological heterogeneity: an ontogeny of concept and approaches. In: Hutchings MJ, John EA, Stewart AJA, editors. The ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Science; p 9-31.
27. Dean W. 1995. With Broadax and Firebrand: The Destruction of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Berkeley, California, U.S.A.: California University Press. (Cap. 4. Estrangement: depopulation and the regrowth forest. p.66-90).
28. Preston, F.W. 1960. Time and space and the variation of species. Ecology 41(4):611-627.
29. Balée, W. Historical ecology and the explanation of diversity: Amazonian case studies. p.19-33. In: Verdade, L.M., M.C. Lyra-Jorge & C.I. Piña [Eds.]. Applied ecology and human dimensions on biological conservation. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (ISBN 978-3-642-54750-8) (DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54751-5_2).
30. Rosalino, L.M., M.C. Lyra-Jorge & L.M. Verdade. 2014. Adaptation and evolution in changing environments. p.53-71. In: Verdade, L.M., M.C. Lyra-Jorge & C.I. Piña [Eds.]. Applied ecology and human dimensions on biological conservation. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (ISBN 978-3-642-54750-8) (DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54751-5_4).
31. Reznick, D. H. Rodd & L. Nunney. 2004. Empirical evidence for rapid evolution. p.101-118. In: Ferrière, R., U. Dieckmann & D. Couvet [Eds.]. Evolutionary Conservation Biology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, U.K.
32. Coltman, D.W., P. O’Donoghue, J.T. Jorgenson, J.T. Hogg, C. Strobeck & M. Festa-Bianchet. Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting. Nature 426:655-658.
33. Epstein, B., M. Jones, R. Hamede, S. Hendricks, H. McCallum, E.P. Murchison, B. Schonfeld, C. Wiench, P. Hohenlohe & A. Storfer. 2016. Rapid evolutionary response to a transmissible cancer in Tasmanian devils. Nature Communications 7:12684 (DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12684).
34. Alcock, J. 1993. Animal behavior. 5th ed. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. (Cap.13. Male and female reproductive tactics. p.395-443).
35. Alcock, J. 1993. Animal behavior. 5th ed. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA. (Cap. 14. The ecology of mating systems. p.445-479).
36. Caughley, G. & A.R.E. Sinclair. 1994. Cap. 5. Dispersal, dispersion, and distribution. p.55-67).
37. Garshelis, D.L. 2000. Delusions in habitat evaluation: measuring use, selection, and importance. p.111-164. In: Boitani, L. & T.K. Fuller [Eds.]. Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences. Columbia University Press. New York.
38. Prevedello, J.A. & M.V. Vieira. 2010. Plantation rows as dispersal routes: A test with didelphid marsupials in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Biological Conservation 143:131–135.
39. Tucker, M.A. et al. Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. Science 359:466-469.
40. Caughley, G. & A.R.E. Sinclair. 1994. Wildlife ecology and management. 1st ed. Blackwell. Boston. (Cap. 16. Widlife harvesting. p.279-290).
41. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243-1248.
42. Verdade, L.M., M. Penteado, C. Gheler-Costa, G. Dotta, L.M. Rosalino, V.R. Pivello & M.C. Lyra-Jorge. 2014. The conservation value of agricultural landscapes. p.91-102. In: Verdade, L.M., M.C. Lyra-Jorge & C.I. Piña [Eds.]. Applied ecology and human dimensions on biological conservation. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (ISBN 978-3-642-54750-8) (DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54751-5_6).
43. Anderson-Teixeira, K.J., B.D. Duval, S.P. Long & E.H. DeLucia. 2012. Biofuels on the landscape: Is “land sharing” preferable to “land sparing”. Ecological Applications 22(8):2035-2048.
44. Souza, D.M., R.F.M. Teixeira & O.L. Ostermann. 2015. Assessing Biodiversity loss due to land use with Life Cycle Assment: are we there yet? Global Change Biology 21:32-47.
45. Caughley, G. & A.R.E. Sinclair. 1994. Wildlife ecology and management. 1st ed. Blackwell. Boston. (Cap. 17. Wildlife control. p.291-300).
46. Palmeira, F.B.L., P.G. Crawshaw Jr., C.M. Haddad, K.M.P.M.B. Ferraz & L.M. Verdade. 2008. Cattle depredation by puma (Puma concolor) and jaguar (Panthera onca) in Northerh Goiás, Central-western Brazil. Biological Conservation 141(1):118-125.
47. Marchini, S. 2014. Who’s in conflict with whom? Human dimensions of the conflicts involving wildlife. p.189-209. In: Verdade, L.M., M.C. Lyra-Jorge & C.I. Piña [Eds.]. Applied ecology and human dimensions on biological conservation. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (ISBN 978-3-642-54750-8) (DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54751-5_13).
48. Peterson, M.N., J.L. Birckhead, K. Leong, M.J. Peterson & T.R. Peterson. 2010. Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict. Conservation Letters 3:74–82 (doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00099x).
49. Sinclair, A.R.E. 1979. Dynamics of the Serengeti ecosystem: process and pattern. p.1-30. In: Sinclair, A.R.E. and M. Norton-Griffiths [Eds.]. Serengeti: Dynamics of an Ecosystem. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
50. Lafferty, K. 2014. Biodiversity loss and infectious diseases. p.73-89. In: In: Verdade, L.M., M.C. Lyra-Jorge & C.I. Piña [Eds.]. Applied ecology and human dimensions on biological conservation. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (ISBN 978-3-642-54750-8) (DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54751-5_5).
51. Cleaveland, S., G.R. Hess, A.P. Dobson, M.K. Laurenson, H.I. McCallum, M.G. & R. Woodroffe. 2002. The role of pathogens in biological conservation. p.139-150. In: Hudson, P.J., A. Rizzoli, B.T. Grenfell, H. Heesterbeek & A.P. Dobson [Eds.]. The Ecology of Wildlife Diseases. Oxford University Press. Oxford, U.K.
52. Taleb, N.N. 2007. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Random House, New York. 366p. (Part 2. We Just can’t predict. p.135-212).
53. Mlodinov, O Andar do Bêbado. Jorge Zahar Editor, Rio de Janeiro. 261p. (Cap.9. Ilusões de padrões e padrões de ilusão. p180-203).
54. Eco, U. 2006[1977]. Como se faz uma tese. Editora Perspectiva. São Paulo. 174p. (Cap. 2. A escolha do tema. p.7-34).
55. Wouters, P., C.R. Sugimoto, V. Larivière, M.E. McVeigh, B. Pulverer, S. de Rijcke, L. Waltman. 2019. Rethink impact factors: find new ways to judge a journal. Nature 569:621-623.
56. Maestre, F.T. 2019. Ten simple rules towards healthier research labs. PLOS Computational Biology15(4): e1006914 (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006914).